Margaret Atwood's "Burning Questions" book prompted John to write her a letter recalling an early encounter. She answered! |
I admit to being a bit miffed that I, the writer in the family, am not the one who received a letter from world-famous Canadian novelist Margaret Atwood the other day.
No, it was my ex-newspaper photographer partner John Denniston
whom Peggy (once you’re in correspondence, the nickname is quite in order) saw
fit to address.
“Dear John,” she wrote in response to his Jan. 17 letter to
her about a memorable encounter at the Edmonton Journal in 1969. In those fraught
early-feminism days, the paper had decreed that every woman had to be
identified as “Miss” or “Mrs.” – the new term “Ms” was verboten. After the photo
session, John asked, and Margaret (definitely not Peggy in this situation),
refused to say. The look she gave him was something he remembers to this day.
“How interesting to read this story after so many
years,” Atwood's March 21 letter continued. “As your memory of our meeting suggests,
choosing a female honorific was a touchy subject at the time – for those on
both sides of the question. It was evidently also a matter of whose wrath would
be worse. Your letter suggests mine, which is probably correct.
“Kind regards,
“Margaret Atwood.”
Here’s what John wrote to prompt this response:
Dear Margaret,
In your book “Burning Questions” there is a story that refers to your time at
the University of Alberta when you were, as I remember it, the poet in
residence. One of the perks of this position was that you had your photograph
published in the Edmonton Journal newspaper.
The photograph was taken in the Journal’s photo department and I was the
photographer assigned. After taking your picture I asked your name, which you
gave me, and then I said, “Is that Miss or Mrs?” You said nothing. I repeated
the question and again you said nothing. I started looking around for clues, a
ring on your finger, then at your companion whose face indicated only, “don’t
ask at me.” I asked the question again and was met again with silence but the
look on your face had changed and your companion had started moving slowly
away, out into the hallway, which I, not being completely clueless, realized
was from his fear of harm being done to me and him not wanting to be collateral
damage. At this point I gave up, said thanks for coming in and left the picture
captioned as Margaret Atwood.
What you didn’t realize is that the day before you came in to have your picture
taken, the editor-in-chief had declared, because of his opposition to the newly
created title “Ms”, that every woman whose name appeared in the newspaper would
be identified as “Miss” or “Mrs” without exception.
I had decided to take my chances with the wrath of the editor-in-chief rather
than with you.
Regards,
John Denniston
As this Sept. 27, 1969 Edmonton Journal photo and column indicate, Margaret Atwood had very definite positions from the start of her famous career. |
No comments:
Post a Comment